ساختار موضوعی فعل حسی «دیدن» در زبان فارسی: رویکرد دستور ساختِ گلدبرگ

References

Åfarli, T.A. (2007). Do verbs have argument structure? In E. Reuland, T. Bhattacharya & G. Spathas (eds.), Argument Structure (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Afrashi, A. & Asgari, S. (2018). Polysemy of perception verb “to see” [didan] in Persian: A cognitive and corpus-based study. Comparative Linguistic Research, 7 (2), 61-73 (In Persian).

Antuñano, I. I. (1999). Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs: A Cross-Linguistic Study. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.

Antuñano, I. I. (2002). Mind-as-body as a cross-linguistic conceptual metaphor. Miscelánea. A Journal of English and American Studies, (25), 93-119.

Asadollahi, Kh. & Shahhosseini, E. (2016). A Semantic Analysis of ‘to see’ (didan) in Hafiz Poetry. Proceeding of 11^th symposium of Persian language and literature Society, 11, 654-672 (In Persian).

Asgari, S. (2016). Analysis of the polysemy of perception verb “to see” [didan] in Persian: A cognitive and corpus-based study. M.A. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch (In Persian).

Bencini, G.M.L. & A.Ε. Goldberg (2000). The Contribution of Argument Structure Constructions to Sentence Meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 640-651.

Borer, H. (2003). Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In J. Moore & M. Polinsky (eds), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory (pp. 31–67). Stanford: CSLI.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Fillmore, C. J. & P. Kay (1993). Construction Grammar. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.

Ghaderi, M., Yousefirad, F., Afrashi, A. & Rowshan, B. (2019). Systematic Polysemy in Cognitive Approach: Studying the Polysemy of “see” in Persain. Journal of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 4 (7), 73-91 (In Persian).

Gisborne, N. (2010). The Event Structure of Perception Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at Work: the Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Goldstein, E. B. (2010). Sensation and perception. Belmont, CA: Wads worth, Cengage Learning.

Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Halliday, M.A.K., & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen, (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.

Hazrati, Y., Yousefirad, F., Rowshan, B. & Ahmadkhani, M.R. (2015). The study of polysemy in Azerbaijani Turkish in the framework of cognitive semantics: visual verb /görmǝk/ (seeing). Foreign Language Research Journal, 5 (2), 243-269 (In Persian).

Jackendoff, R. S. (1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Karimi-Doostan, Gh. (2000). Some Persian Compounds and Derivatives and Argument Structure Theory. Journal of Social Science and Humanities of Shiraz University, 15-16 (1-2), 193-201 (In Persian).

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Mousavi, S. H., Amoozadeh, M. & Rezai, V. (2016). Analysis of the Word ‘Didan’ Based on Frame Semantics. Language Related Research, 6 (7), 219-236 (In Persian).

Neagu, M. (2013). What is universal and what is language specific in the polysemy of perception verbs, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LVIII 3, 329–343.

Nolan, B. (2013). Constructional polysemy and argument realisation with the Irish GET verb. in E. van Gelderen, J. Barðdal & M. Cennamo (eds.), Argument Structure in Flux (pp. 87-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Perek, F. (2015). Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Ramonda, K. (2014). Goldberg’s Construction Grammar. In J. Littlemore & J.R. Taylor (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 60-71). London: Bloomsbury.

Strenberg, R.J. (2006). Cognitive psychology. California: Thomson Wadsworth.

Viberg, Å. (2008). Swedish verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive perspective. In M.A. Gómez-González, J.L. Mackenzie & E.M. Álvarez, (Eds.), Languages and cultures in contrast and comparison (pp. 123-172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.