Impact of Harvesting the Aerial Part of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as Forage on Tuber Yield

AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis, 15th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.

Ciccoli R., Sperandei M., Petrazzuolo F., Broglia M., Chiarini L., Correnti A., Tabacchioni S. 2018. Anaerobic digestion of the above ground biomass of Jerusalem Artichoke in a pilot plant: Impact of the preservation method on the biogas yield and microbial community. Biomass and Bioenergy 108: 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.11.003

Denoroy P. 1996. The crop physiology of Helianthus tuberosus L.: a model oriented view. Biomass and bioenergy 11(1):11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(96)00006-2

Diederichsen A. 2010. Phenotypic diversity of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) germplasm preserved by the Canadian gene bank. Hellia 33 (53): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2298/HEL1053001D

Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.T., Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28 (3): 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017

Gao K., Zhang Z., Zhu T., Tian X., Gao Y., Zhao L., Li T. 2019. The influence of leaf removal on tuber yield and fuel characteristics of Helianthus tuberosus L. in a semi-arid area. Industrial Crops and Products 131: 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.01.024

Gao K., Zhang Z., Zhu T., Coulter, J.A. 2020. The influence of flower removal on tuber yield and biomass characteristics of Helianthus tuberosus L. in a semi-arid area. Industrial Crops and Products 150:112374-112380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112374

Gunnarsson I.B., Svensson S.E., Johansson E., Karakashev D., Angelidaki I. 2014. Potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a biorefinery crop. Industrial Crops and Products 56: 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.010

Hay R.K.M., Offer N.W. 1992. Helianthus tuberosus as an alternative forage crop for cool maritime regions: a preliminary study of the yield and nutritional quality of shoot tissues from perennial stands. Science of Food and Agriculture 60 (2): 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740600209

Kays S.J., Nottingham, S.F. 2007. Biology and chemistry of Jerusalem artichoke: Helianthus tuberosus L. CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420044966

Kou Y.X., Zeng J., Liu J.Q., Zhao C.M. 2014. Germplasm diversity and differentiation of Helianthus tuberosus L. revealed by AFLP marker and phenotypic traits. The Journal of Agricultural Science 152 (5): 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859613000476

Krober W., Heklau H., Bruelheide H. 2015. Leaf morphology of 40 evergreen and deciduous broad leaved subtropical tree species and relationships to functional ecophysiological traits. Plant Biology. 17: 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12250

Li L., Shao T., Yang H., Chen M., Gao X., Long X., Rengel Z. 2017. The endogenous plant hormones and ratios regulate sugar and dry matter accumulation in Jerusalem artichoke in salt-soil. Science of the Total Environment 578: 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.075

Long X.H., Shao H.B., Liu L., Liu L.P., Liu Z.P. 2016. Jerusalem artichoke: A sustainable biomass feedstock for biorefinery. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 54: 1382-1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.063

Malmberg A., Theander O. 1986. Differences in chemical composition of leaves and stem in Jerusalem artichoke and changes in low-molecular sugar and fructan content with time of harvest. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 16 (1): 7-12.

Mclaurin W.J., Somda Z.C., Kays S.J. 1999. Jerusalem artichoke growth, development, and field storage.I. Numerical assessment of plant part development and dry matter acquisition and allocation. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22 (8):1303-1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169909365714.

Panchev I., Delchev N., Kovacheva D., Slavov A. 2011. Physicochemical characteristics of inulins obtained from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). European Food Research and Technology 233 (5): 889-896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1584-8

Papi N., Kafilzadeh F., Fazael, H. 2017. Effects of incremental substitution of maize silage with Jerusalem artichoke silage on performance of fat-tailed lambs. Small Ruminant Research 147: 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.11.013

Papi N., Kafilzadeh F., Fazaeli H. 2019. Use of Jerusalem artichoke aerial parts as forage in fat-tailed sheep diet. Small Ruminant Research 174: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.03.001

Rossini F., Provenzano M.E., Kuzmanović L., Ruggeri R. 2019. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): a versatile and sustainable crop for renewable energy production in Europe. Agronomy 9(9): 528-568. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090528

Slimestad R., Seljaasen R., Meijer K., Skar S.L. 2010. Norwegian-grown Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): morphology and content of sugars and fructo-oligosaccharides in stems and tubers. Science Food Agriculture 90(6): 956-964. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3903

Stauffer M.D., Chubey B.B., Dorrell D.G. 1980. Growth, yield and compositional characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke as it relates to biomass production. Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., Prepr; (United States), 25 (CONF-800814-P3).

Swanton C.J., Clements D.R., Moore M.J., Cavers P.B. 1992. The biology of Canadian weeds. 101. Helianthus tuberosus L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 72 (4): 1367-1382. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps92-169

Van Soest P.Y., Robertson J., Lewis B. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and no starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Wang Y., Zhao Y., Xue F., Nan X., Wang H., Hua D., Liu J., Yang L., Jiang L., Xiong B. 2020. Nutritional value, bioactivity, and application potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a neotype feed resource. Animal Nutrition 6 (4): 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.09.001