آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 23 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 368 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,890 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,566,220 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,821,878 |
Identifying the best method for linearizing the nonlinear friction term to analyze the transient flow in pipeline systems | ||
| Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 9، شماره 2، اسفند 2022، صفحه 107-120 اصل مقاله (1.8 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22126/arww.2022.8069.1263 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mahshid Alsadat Mousavian؛ Mohammad Mehdi Riyahi* ؛ Ali Haghighi | ||
| Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| To analyze transient flows, continuity and momentum equations must be solved. Due to the non-linear friction term in the momentum equation, numerical methods such as method of characteristics (MOC) are used to analyze the problem in the time domain. Although numerical methods are easy to use, but they are numerically expensive and time-consuming, especially for advanced applications of transient analysis, e.g., real-time evaluations and fault detection algorithms, including inverse problem solutions. To cope with mentioned problems, an approximate analytical solution should be investigated, which is not required high computational time. To this end, the nonlinear equations should be linearized. Thus, the focus of this paper is to investigate the linearization methods. Therefore, four different linearization methods are applied and the resulting equations of each method in different RPV systems are solved. The efficiency of each method is compared with the results obtained from the numerical analysis of nonlinear governing equations. The results show that linearized water hammer equations provide reasonable results in early pressure wave cycles. The obtained results show that the coefficient of determination (R2) of the linearized models changes from 0.92 to 0.99. Also, by comparing the results of linearization models with each other, the linearized momentum equation in the time domain by replacing the mean velocity instead of the instantaneous velocity is the most accurate model which R2 is 0.999452. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Pipeline systems؛ Transient flow؛ Method of characteristics؛ Time domain؛ Frequency domain | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amein M., Chu HL., Implicit numerical modeling of unsteady flows, Journal of the Hydraulics Division 6 (1975) 717-731.Angelopoulos K., Georgoulaki K., Glentis G.O., Evaluating the impact of spectral estimators on frequency domain feature classification applications for pipe leakage detection, In 2022 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (2022) 1-6. Basha H.A., Kassab B.G., A perturbation solution to the transient pipe flow problem, Journal of Hydraulic Research 34 (1996) 633-649. Basha H.A., Kassab B.G., Analysis of water distribution systems using a perturbation method, Applied mathematical modelling 20 (1996) 290-297. Bender C.M., Milton K.A., Pinsky S.S., Simmons L.M., A new perturbative approach to nonlinear problems, Journal of mathematical Physics 30 (1989) 1447-1455. Bergant A., Ross Simpson A., Vìtkovsk J., Developments in unsteady pipe flow friction modelling, Journal of Hydraulic Research 39 (2001) 249-257. Boulos P.F., Karney B.W., Wood D.J., Lingireddy S., Hydraulic transient guidelines for protecting water distribution systems, Journal‐American Water Works Association 97 (2005) 111-124. Brunone B., Golia U.M., Greco M., Some remarks on the momentum equation for fast transients, In Proceedings of the International Meeting on Hydraulic Transients with Column Separation (1991) 201-209. Carstens M.R., Roller J.E., Boundary-shear stress in unsteady turbulent pipe flow, Journal of the Hydraulics Division 85 (1959) 67-81. Chaudhry M.H., Transient-flow equations, In Applied hydraulic transients, Springer: New York, NY; (2014). Izquierdo J., Iglesias P.L., Mathematical modelling of hydraulic transients in simple systems., Mathematical and Computer Modelling 35 (2002) 801-812.Keramat A., Karney B., Ghidaoui M.S., Wang X., Transient-based leak detection in the frequency domain considering fluid–structure interaction and viscoelasticity, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 153 (2021) 107500. Kim S., Impedance matrix method for transient analysis of complicated pipe networks, Journal of Hydraulic Research 45 (2007) 818-828. Lee P.J., Lambert M.F., Simpson A.R., Vítkovský J.P., Liggett J., Experimental verification of the frequency response method for pipeline leak detection, Journal of Hydraulic research 44 (2006) 693-707.Lee P.J., Vítkovský J.P., Quantifying linearization error when modeling fluid pipeline transients using the frequency response method, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 136 (2010) 831-836. Liggett J.A., Chen L.C., Inverse transient analysis in pipe networks, Journal of hydraulic engineering 120 (1994) 934-55.Pan B., Duan H.F., Meniconi S., Brunone B., FRF-based transient wave analysis for the viscoelastic parameters identification and leak detection in water-filled plastic pipes, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 146 (2021) 107056. Provenzano P.G., Baroni F., Aguerre R. J., The closing function in the waterhammer modeling, Latin American applied research 41 (2011) 43-47. Ranginkaman M.H., Haghighi A., Samani H.M.V., Application of the frequency response method for transient flow analysis of looped pipe networks, International Journal of Civil Engineering 15 (2017) 677-687. Ranginkaman M.H., Haghighi A., Lee P.J., Frequency domain modelling of pipe transient flow with the virtual valves method to reduce linearization errors, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 131 (2019) 486-504. Ramos H., Covas D., Borga A., Loureiro D., Surge damping analysis in pipe systems: modelling and experiments, Journal of hydraulic Research 42 (2004) 413-425. Rich, George R., Water-hammer analysis by the Laplace-Mellin transformation, Trans. ASME 67 (1945) 361-376. Riyahi M.M., Investigation of error resources in the transient flow simulation of pipelines in the frequency domain using the transfer matrix method, Modares Mechanical Engineering 18 (2018) 10-18. Riyahi M.M., Rahmanshahi M., Ranginkaman M.H., Frequency domain analysis of transient flow in pipelines; application of the genetic programming to reduce the linearization errors, Journal of Hydraulic Structures 4 (2018) 75-90. Sobey R.J., Analytical solutions for unsteady pipe flow, Journal of Hydroinformatics 6 (2004) 187-207.Sobey R.J., Analytical solution of non-homogeneous wave equation, Coastal engineering journal 44 (2002) 1-23. Vítkovský J.P., Lee P.J., Zecchin A.C., Simpson A.R., Lambert M.F., Head-and flow-based formulations for frequency domain analysis of fluid transients in arbitrary pipe networks, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 5 (2011) 556-68.Vardy A.E., Brown J.M., Transient turbulent friction in smooth pipe flows, Journal of sound and vibration 33 (1995) 435-456. Vardy A., Brown J., On turbulent, unsteady, smooth-pipe friction, In BHR group conference series publication 19 (1996) 289-312. Vítkovský J.P., Bergant A., Simpson A.R., Lambert M.F., Systematic evaluation of one-dimensional unsteady friction models in simple pipelines, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 7 (2006) 696-708. Wang X., Lambert M., Simpson A., Analysis of a transient in a pipeline with a leak using Laplace Transforms, 14th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Dept Mechanical Engineering (2001).Wang C., Yang J.D., Water hammer simulation using explicit–implicit coupling methods, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 141 (2015) 04014086.Wood F.M., The application of heaviside's operational calculus to the solution of problems in water hammer, Trans. ASME 59 (1937) 707-713. Wylie E.B., Streeter V.L., Suo L., Fluid transients in systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; (1993). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 127 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 237 |
||