تعداد نشریات | 23 |
تعداد شمارهها | 368 |
تعداد مقالات | 2,890 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,566,214 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,821,871 |
AI-enhanced flood forecasting: Harnessing upstream data for downstream protection | ||
Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater | ||
دوره 10، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 20، اسفند 2023، صفحه 119-132 اصل مقاله (2.24 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22126/arww.2024.10226.1322 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Isa Ebtehaj* 1؛ Hossein Bonakdari2؛ Baram Gharabaghi3 | ||
1Department of Soils and Agri-Food Engineering, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. | ||
2Department. of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. | ||
3School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada | ||
چکیده | ||
This research devised a cutting-edge artificial intelligence methodology to enhance flood forecasting in Quebec, Canada, an area frequently affected by floods. The core of this project was creating a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model (i.e., Generalized Structure of Group Method of Data Handling) dedicated to the early detection of potential flood events. Utilizing data from two key hydrometric stations, Saint-Charles and Huron, located within the region, the study aggregated data from 15-minute intervals into comprehensive hourly averages. An initial analysis sought to understand the relationship between river flow rates and the environmental factors of temperature and precipitation upstream and downstream. The investigation uncovered intricate relationships among these factors, presenting challenges in accurately predicting floods. To address this, a specialized AI model was developed to translate the flow data from the Huron station to predict potential flooding at the Saint-Charles station. This model, leveraging 48-hour lag data from upstream, was designed to forecast flood events at the Saint-Charles station with lead times ranging from one to eighteen hours. The model demonstrated significant predictive accuracy, with a correlation coefficient surpassing 0.9. Consequently, this innovative AI model emerges as a promising tool for improving Quebec's flood prediction and early-warning systems. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Artificial intelligence؛ Flood prediction؛ Predictive analytics؛ Quebec؛ Water resource management | ||
مراجع | ||
Azimi, H., Bonakdari, H., Ebtehaj, I. (2017) ‘A highly efficient gene expression programming model for predicting the discharge coefficient in a side weir along a trapezoidal canal’, Irrigation and Drainage, 66 (4), pp. 655-666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2127 Azimi, H. et al. (2018) ‘Evolutionary design of generalized group method of data handling-type neural network for estimating the hydraulic jump roller length, Acta Mechanica’, 229 (3), pp. 1197-1214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-2043-9 Balica, S.F. et al. (2013) ‘Parametric and physically based modelling techniques for flood risk and vulnerability assessment: A comparison’, Environmental Modelling and Software, 41, pp. 84–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.002. Ebtehaj, I., and Bonakdari, H. (2016) ‘A support vector regression-firefly algorithm-based model for limiting velocity prediction in sewer pipes’, Water Science and Technology, 73 (9), pp. 2244-2250. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.064 Ebtehaj, I., and Bonakdari, H. (2023), ‘A comprehensive comparison of the fifth and sixth phases of the coupled model intercomparison project based on the Canadian earth system models in spatio-temporal variability of long-term flood susceptibility using remote sensing and flood frequency analysis’, Journal of Hydrology, 617, p. 128851. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128851 Ebtehaj, I., Bonakdari, H., and Zaji, A. H. (2018), ‘A new hybrid decision tree method based on two artificial neural networks for predicting sediment transport in clean pipes, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(3), pp. 1783-1795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.05.021 Ebtehaj, I. et al. (2023a), ‘Short-Term Precipitation Forecasting Based on the Improved Extreme Learning Machine Technique’, Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 25(1), pp. 1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-7-14237 Ebtehaj, I. et al. (2023b), ‘Multi-depth daily soil temperature modeling: meteorological variables or time series?’, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 151(3-4), pp. 989-1012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04314-y Ebtehaj, I. et al. (2020), ‘Evaluation of preprocessing techniques for improving the accuracy of stochastic rainfall forecast models,’ International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 17(1), pp. 505-524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02361-z Gao, J., Christensen, P., and Li, W. (2017), ‘Application of the WEAP model in strategic environmental assessment: Experiences from a case study in an arid/semi-arid area in China’, Journal of Environmental Management, 198, pp. 363-371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.068 Gizaw, M.S.; and Gan, T.Y. (2016) ‘Regional flood frequency analysis using support vector regression under historical and future climate’, Journal of Hydrology, 538, pp. 387–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.041 Khozani, Z. S., Bonakdari, H., and Ebtehaj, I. (2017), ‘An analysis of shear stress distribution in circular channels with sediment deposition based on Gene Expression Programming’, International Journal of Sediment Research, 32(4), pp. 575-584. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2017.04.004 Kim, B. et al. (2015) ‘Urban flood modeling with porous shallow-water equations: A case study of model errors in the presence of anisotropic porosity’, Journal of Hydrolgy, 523, pp. 680–692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.059 Kollet, S.J., and Maxwell, R.M. (2006), ‘Integrated surface–groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model’, Advances in Water Resources, 29, 945–958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.006 Letessier, C. et al. (2023) ‘Enhancing flood prediction accuracy through integration of meteorological parameters in river flow observations: A case study Ottawa River’, Hydrology, 10(8), pp. 1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10080164 Li, D. et al. (2018) ‘Development and integration of sub-daily flood modelling capability within the SWAT model and a comparison with XAJ model’ Water, 10(9), pp. 1263. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091263 López, P. L. et al. (2020) ‘Evaluation of global water resources reanalysis data for estimating flood events in the Brahmaputra River basin’, Water Resources Management, 34, pp. 2201-2220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02546-z Lotfi, K., et al. (2020) ‘A novel stochastic wastewater quality modeling based on fuzzy techniques’, Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 18, pp. 1099-1120. doi: https://doi.org/1099-1120. 10.1007/s40201-020-00530-8 Lotfi, K. et al. (2019) ‘Predicting wastewater treatment plant quality parameters using a novel hybrid linear-nonlinear methodology’, Journal of Environmental Management, 240, pp. 463-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.137 McGrath, H., Stefanakis E., and Nastev., M. (2014), ‘Development of a data warehouse for riverine and coastal flood risk management’, The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40 (2), pp. 41-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-41-2014 Mekanik, F. et al. (2013) ‘Multiple regression and artificial neural network for long-term rainfall forecasting using large scale climate modes’, Journal of Hydrology, 503, pp. 11–21. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.035 Mosavi, A. and Edalatifar, M., 2019. A hybrid neuro-fuzzy algorithm for prediction of reference evapotranspiration. In Recent Advances in Technology Research and Education: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Global Research and Education Inter-Academia–2018 17 (pp. 235-243). Springer International Publishing.. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99834-3_31 Puttinaovarat, S. and Horkaew, P., 2020. Flood forecasting system based on integrated big and crowdsource data by using machine learning techniques. IEEE Access, 8, pp.5885-5905. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963819 Ramly, S. et al. (2020) ‘Flood estimation for SMART control operation using integrated radar rainfall Input with the HEC-HMS model’, Water Resources Management, 34(10), pp. 3113-3127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02595-4 Saberi-Movahed, F., Najafzadeh, M., and Mehrpooya, A. (2020) ‘Receiving more accurate predictions for longitudinal dispersion coefficients in water pipelines: training group method of data handling using extreme learning machine conceptions’, Water Resources Management, 34(2), pp. 529-561. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02463-w Safari, M. J. S. et al. (2019) ‘Sediment transport modeling in rigid boundary open channels using generalize structure of group method of data handling’, Journal of Hydrology, 577, p. 123951. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123951 Sahraei, S., Asadzadeh, M., and Unduche, F. (2020) ‘Signature-based multi-modelling and multi-objective calibration of hydrologic models: Application in flood forecasting for Canadian Prairies’, Journal of Hydrology, 588, p. 125095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125095 Shrubsole, D. et al. (1993) ‘The history of flood damages in Ontario’, Canadian Water Resources Journal, 18, pp. 133–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.12509510.4296/cwrj1802133 Sihag, P. et al. (2019) ‘Modeling unsaturated hydraulic conductivity by hybrid soft computing techniques’, Soft Computing, 23, pp. 12897-12910. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03847-1 Soltani, K., et al. (2021) ‘Mapping the spatial and temporal variability of flood susceptibility using remotely sensed normalized difference vegetation index and the forecasted changes in the future’, Science of The Total Environment, 770, p. 145288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145288 Taherei Ghazvinei, P. et al. (2018) ‘Sugarcane growth prediction based on meteorological parameters using extreme learning machine and artificial neural network’, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12, 738–749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1526119 Walton, R. et al. (2019) ‘Estimating 2-year flood flows using the generalized structure of the Group Method of Data Handling’, Journal of Hydrology, 575, pp. 671-689. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.068 Zahmatkesh, Z. et al. (2019) ‘An overview of river flood forecasting procedures in Canadian watersheds’, Canadian Water Resources Journal/Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques, 44(3), pp. 213-229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2019.1601598 Zaji, A. H., Bonakdari, H., and Gharabaghi, B. (2018) ‘Applying upstream satellite signals and a 2-D error minimization algorithm to advance early warning and management of flood water levels and river discharge’, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(2), pp. 902-910. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2862640 Zeynoddin, M. et al. (2019) ‘A reliable linear stochastic daily soil temperature forecast model’, Soil and Tillage Research, 189, pp. 73-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.12.023. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 95 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 206 |