Exploring the Effect of Corrective Feedback Through QuillBot on EFL Learners’ Writing skill

Agbayahoun, J. P. (2016). Teacher Written Feedback on Student Writing: Teachers’ and
Learners’ Perspectives. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(10).
DOI:10.17507/tpls.0610.01

Akayoğlu,S.(2019). Theoretical frameworks used in CALL studies. Teaching English with Technology, 19(4), 104-118.

Alavi, S.M., & Kaivanpanah, S. (2007).  Feedback expectancy and EFL learners’ achievement in English. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3(2), 181-196.

Aldosemani, T. I., Assalahi, H., Lhothali, A., & Albsisi, M. (2023). Automated Writing Evaluation in EFL Contexts: A Review of Effectiveness, Impact, and Pedagogical Implications. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.329962

Amini Farsani, M., & Mohammadi, V. (2022). Mixed-methods research in an EFL context: A quality assessment perspective. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(2), 99-122.

Ariyanti, A. (2016). The Teaching of EFL Writing in Indonesia: The Teaching of EFL Writing in Indonesia. Dinamika Ilmu. 16. 10.21093/di.v16i2.274.

Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2013). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning
and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389–411. doi:10.1080/
09585176.2012.744327.

Avarzamani, F. & Farahian, M. (2019). An investigation into EFL learners’ reflection in
writing and the inhibitors to their reflection. Cogent Psychology, 6:
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1690817

Aydin, Z., & Yıldız, S. (2014). Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 160–80.

Bae, S. H. (2016). A review of automated writing evaluation systems. Computers and Composition, 40, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.05.003

Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning, design, and technology (pp. 1-23). Springer.

Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press.

Braun V, Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psych, 3: 77–101.

Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing service. AI Magazine, 25(3), 27–36.

Can, T. (2009). Learning and teaching languages online: A constructivist approach. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(1), 60-74.

Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2018). Automated writing evaluation: Implications for writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 38, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.01.002

Chan, C.K.Y., Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the

         accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3),

         267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00038-9

Chen, H., Pan, J. (2022). Computer or human: a comparative study of automated evaluation scoring and instructors’ feedback on Chinese college students’ English writing. Asian. J. Second. Foreign. Lang. Educ. 7, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00171-4

Cheraghi, Z., Nejati,R.,& Bakhtiari, A. (2022). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ critical thinking disposition and their writing strategy use. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 5(17), 51-58.

Cheung, Y. (2016). Feedback from automated essay evaluation systems: A Review of selected research. TESL Reporter, 48(2), 1–15.

Chi, Do Na & Nguyen, Mai. (2017). Paraphrasing in academic writing: A Case study of Vietnamese learners of English. Language Education in Asia, 8, 9-24. 10.5746/LEiA/17/V8/I1/A02/Na_Mai.

Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., & Tetreault, J. (2010). The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners:  Feedback and assessment. Language Testing, 27(3), 419−436.

Cui,Y., Schunn, C.D., Gai, X., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z.(2021). Effects of trained peer vs. teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and internalisation of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788474

Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256.

Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256– 274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256

DeSantis L, Noel Ugarriza D. (2000). The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. West. J. Nurs. Res, 22, 351–372.

Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006

Ebadi, S., Gholami, M., & Vakili, S. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Using Grammarly in EFL Writing: The Case of Articles. Computers in the Schools, 40(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2150067

Elliot, N., & Klobucar, A. (2013). Automated essay evaluation and the teaching of writing. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions (pp. 16–35). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the
acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339-368.doi:10.1017/S0272263106060141

Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2014). Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL
composition. System, 46, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.011.

Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jslw.2018.05.005.

Fathali, S., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2015). The impact of guided writing practice on the speaking proficiency and attitude of EFL elementary learners. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 7(1), 1-25.

Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students.

         Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 81–104). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007.

Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fithriani, R. (2019). ZPD and the benefits of written feedback in L2 writing: Focusing on students’ perceptions. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal,19(1), 63-73.

Fitria, T. N. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and
rewriting of English writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities,9(1), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233

Fu, Q.-K., Zou, D., Xie, H. & Cheng, G. (2022). A review of AWE feedback: Types, learning outcomes, and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787

Ghasemi, B., Hashemi, M., & Barani, G. (2011). The capabilities of the Internet in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 1042-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.194

Gilakjani, A.P., Leong, L., & Ismail, H.N. (2013). Teachers’ use of technology and constructivism. I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science,4,49-63.

Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105.

Grimes D., Warschauer M. (2010). Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation. Journal of Technology, Language, and Assessment, 8(6), 1–43.

Han, S., & Shin, J. A. (2017). Teaching Google search techniques in an L2 academic writing context. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 172–194.

Harrer, S. (2023). Attention is not all you need: The complicated case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine. eBioMedicine, 90, 104512. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ebiom. 2023. 104512

Hashemi, M., & Azizinezhad, M. (2011). The role of CALL in fostering learner autonomy. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(4), 55-62.

Hibert, A. I. (2019). Systematic literature review of automated writing evaluation as a formative learning tool. Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, 199–212. doi:10.1007/978-3- 030-29736-7_15

Hubbard, P. (2009). Computer assisted language learning: Critical concepts in linguistics. Routledge.

Hubbard, P. (2023). Emerging technologies and language learning: mining the past to transform the future. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 3(2), 239-257.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Jacobs., Holly. L., Stephen, A., Zingkgraf., Deanne. R., Wormuth, V., Faye, H., Jane, B., Hughey. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Kurniati, E. & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of QuillBot
utilisation in English academic writing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics 7(3):437-451, https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852.

Lam, P.T. (2021). The influence of note-taking technique On EFL learners’ listening comprehension in a higher education context. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies,25(2), 2-25.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language
Teaching. OUP.

Li, S., & Huo, S. (2020). Automated writing evaluation systems: An overview and implications for teaching. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.05.003

Mariappan, R., Tan, K.H., Yang, J., Chen, J., & Chang, P.K. (2022). Synthesising the attributes of computer-based error analysis for ESL and EFL learning: A scoping review. Sustainability, 14, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315649

Marzuki, , Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin,  , & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organisation of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050

Moore, N.S., MacArthur, C.A. (2016). Student use of automated essay evaluation technology during revision. J. Writ. Res. 8 (1), 149–175.

Nagata, N. (1996). Computer vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition.
CALICO Journal, 14(1), 53–75.

Naghdipour, B., & Koç, S. (2014). The evaluation of a teaching intervention in Iranian EFL writing. Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 24, 389 – 398.

Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. (2021). The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.

O’Dea, X. (2024). Generative AI: is it a paradigm shift for higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 49, 811-816.

Oxford University Press, (2001). Quick placement test. Retrieved from https://elt.oup.com/feature/global/oxford-online-placement/?cc=ir&selLanguage=en

Ramesh, D., Sanampudi, S.K. (2022). An automated essay scoring systems: a systematic literature review. Artif Intell Rev 55, 2495–2527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10068-2

Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816

Rosen, Y., & Foltz, P. (2014). Assessing collaborative problem solving through automated
technologies. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 9, 389–410.

Safari, P., & Rashidi, N. (2015). A critical look at the EFL education and the challenges
faced by Iranian teachers in the educational system. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(2), 14–28.

Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching:
A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39–56.

Salmani Nodoushan, M.A. (2018). Toward a taxonomy of errors in Iranian EFL learners’ basic-level writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 61-78.

Saricaoglu, A. (2018). The impact of automated feedback on L2 learners’ written causal
explanations. ReCALL, 31(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401800006X.

Sheen, Y., and Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in the language teaching. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (E. Editor, Ed.). Routledge.

Sherafati, N., Largani, F.M. & Amini, S. (2020). Exploring the effect of computer-mediated teacher feedback on the writing achievement of Iranian EFL learners: Does motivation count? Educ Inf Technol 25, 4591–4613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10177-5

Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological
environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 165–180 10125/25148.

Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological
environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 165–180 10125/25148.

Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the
quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51–65. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007

Thi, N.K., Nikolov, M. (2023). Effects of teacher, automated, and combined feedback on syntactic complexity in EFL students’ writing. Asian. J. Second. Foreign. Lang. Educ. 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00182-1

Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003.

Wale, B.D., & Kassahun, Y.F. (2024). The transformative power of AI writing technologies: Enhancing EFL writing instruction through the integrative use of Writerly and Google Docs. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9221377

Wang, T. (2019). The role of technology in the writing process: A review of literature. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i01.8606

Wang, Y. (2014). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for
advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.881386

Wang, Y., Shang, H., & H. Briody, P. (2013). Exploring the impact of using automated
writing evaluation in English as a foreign language university students’ writing. ComputerAssisted Language Learning, 26(3), 234-257, https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.655300.

Weigle, S. C. (2013). English as a second language writing and automated essay evaluation. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay scoring (pp. 36-54). Routledge.

Yeha, Sh., & Lob, J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computers & Education, 52(4), 882–892.

Zaini, A., & Mazdayasna, G. (2014). The effect of computer-assisted language learning on the development of EFL learners’ writing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 98. 1975-1982. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.631.

Zhang, Z. (2017). Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: A case study.
ELT Journal, 71(3), 317–328.

Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback
on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102

Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2008). College English Test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25(3), 408-417.

Zhou, W., & Ma, Y. (2021). The effectiveness of automated feedback on student writing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120959477

Zolfaghari ‎, F. (2023). Answer changing in online and traditional pen-paper tests: The case ‎of upper intermediate EFL learners with different cognitive styles. Applied Research on English Language, 12(3), 1-22. doi: 10.22108/are.2023.138092.2112