آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 23 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 368 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,890 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,566,238 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,821,898 |
Equative Constructions in the Laki Language | ||
| مطالعات زبان‌ها و گویش‌های غرب ایران | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 12، شماره 4، دی 1403، صفحه 67-80 اصل مقاله (296.76 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22126/jlw.2024.11062.1789 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Parisa Najafi* 1؛ Seyed Najm al-din Shahrokhi2؛ Mohammad Hosseini3 | ||
| 1Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. | ||
| 3MA, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Different linguistic constructions, including comparative, superlative, similative, and equative constructions, are employed to convey the concept of comparison. Equative and similative constructions exhibit the highest semantic and structural resemblance out of all the specified constructions. In such constructions, two entities -referred to as the comparee and the standard- are compared based on a specific characteristic or quality. In equative constructions the comparison is based on a gradable property, where one of the referents has the property to a higher degree, while similative constructions compare the similarity in manner. This study explored the equative constructions in the Laki language by primarily relying on classification put forth by Haspelmath (2017). The data for the present study consists of 123 equative sentences taken from spoken interviews with twelve individuals residing in Noorabad city. The findings indicate that speakers mainly use seven strategies to convey the concept of equality in Laki. Furthermore, the data show that in numerous equative constructions in Laki, there is a preference for omitting the standard marker while retaining the degree marker | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| comparison؛ equative construction؛ Laki language؛ similative construction | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdi, R. (2012). An introduction to the Laki language. Lorestan: Sifa. Aman Allahii Baharvand, S. (2006). Ghom-e Lor. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian] Arzhang, G. (1971). Adjective and its grammatical role in Modern Persian language. Faculty of Literature and Humanities University of Tehran, 3(77). Dabir Moghaddam, M. (2013). Radeshenasi-e Zabanha-e Irani (3rd ed., Vol. 2). Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]. Farshidvard, K. (2008). Dastor-e mofassal-e Emroz. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian] Haspelmath, M., & Buchholz, O. (1998). Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In J. vɑn der Auwera (Ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, (pp. 277–334). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Haspelmath, M., & the Leipzig Equative Constructions Team. (2017). Equative constructions in world-wide perspective. In Y. Treis & M. Vanhove (Eds.), Similative and Equative Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (pp. 9–32). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.117.02 Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Henkelmann, P. (2006). Constructions of equative comparison. STUF-Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 59(4), 370–398. Imani A. (2023). The superlative comparison schemas in Persian. Language Related Research, 14(2), 261-292. URL: http://lrr.modares.ac.ir/article-14-53130-fa.html Imani, A. (2021). A typological study of superlative comparison in Persian. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 13(1), 163-180. DOI: 10.22108/jrl.2022.130547.1602 [In Persian] Mace, J. (2003). Persian grammar: For reference and revision. London: Routledge. Najafi, P., & Rahimian, J. (2020). Equative constructions in Persian language. Zabanpazhuhi (Journal of Language Research), 13(38), 243-264. [In Persian] Najafi, P., Rahimian, J., & Rezaei, M. (2022). Equative construction in Turkic Azarbaijani. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 14(42), 149-171. DOI: 10.22051/jlr.2019.25554.1685 Nose, M. (2010). A contrastive study of comparative constructions among English, Japanese, and Tok Pisin: By using corpora in cross-linguistic contrast. In R. Xiao (Ed.). Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies (pp. 457-470). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Popjes, J., & Popjes, J. (1986). Canela-Krahô. In C. D. Derbyshire & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages (Vol. 1, pp. 128–199). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Rawlinson, H. (1981). Rawlinson's travelogue (S. Aman Allahi Baharvandnd, Trans.). Tehran: Agah. Sahaby, S. (2014). Historical development of comparative and superlative adjectives in Old Iranian and West Middle Iranian languages and New Persian authors. Journal of Language Research, 5(1), 41-56. Schaub, W. (1985). Babungo. London: Croom Helm. Shariat, M. (1989). Dastur-e zaban-e Farsi. Tehran: Asatir. [In Persian]. Stassen, L. (1985). Comparison and universal Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Vɑnhove, M. (2017) Similative, equative, and comparative constructions in Beja (North-Cushitic). In Y. Treis & M. Vanhove (Eds.), Similative and Equative Constructions. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (pp. 189–212). John Benjamins. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 111 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 92 |
||