آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 408 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,249 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,064,877 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,126,083 |
Grammaticalization of Persian Suffixes: From Ancient Roots to Modern Usage | ||
| مطالعات زبان‌ها و گویش‌های غرب ایران | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 13، شماره 3، مهر 1404، صفحه 53-70 اصل مقاله (685.77 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22126/jlw.2025.11312.1804 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| ZohrehSadat Naseri* | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study employs a descriptive framework to explore the evolution of several suffixes in contemporary Persian. The primary focus is to determine whether these suffixes were recognized as such in ancient Iranian languages or if they functioned as independent morphemes that gradually evolved into grammatical elements. Grammaticalization is examined as the process through which lexical components acquire grammatical roles, or how elements with existing grammatical features become increasingly grammaticalized. A critical question arises regarding independent morphemes that have transitioned into suffixes: Have they entirely lost their original meanings and become purely grammatical tools for word formation, or do they retain independent functions in certain contexts? An analysis of the suffixes -(e)stān, -bār, -bān, -dān, -pād, -zār, -gār/-ger, -kade, and -gāh, along with their meanings and usages in contemporary Persian, indicates that these suffixes were once free morphemes in the ancient Iranian period. Over time, due to linguistic changes, they have diminished in lexical independence and are now primarily used as adjectival or locative suffixes in modern Persian. The necessity to generate new vocabulary for various phenomena has significantly influenced the grammaticalization of many independent morphemes. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Persian suffixes؛ gramaticalization؛ evolution of suffixes؛ ethymology of suffixes | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abolghasemi, M. (2008). Historical grammar of Persian language. SAMT. [In Persian] Ali-Askarova, K. T. (1991). -vān and -bān Sufixes (M. Mousavi, Trans.). Culture and Life, 76–81. (Original work published 1976) [In Persian] Amid, H. (n.d.). Amid Persian dictionary. In Vajehyab. Retrived May 30, 2024, from /http://www.vajehyab.com [In Persian] Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press. De Blois, F. (1996). -gaçh (place) and -gaçh (throne) in Persian (H. Rezaei Bagh-Bidi, Trans.). Journal of Academy Letter, (5), 71–83. (Original work published 1995) [In Persian] Dehkhoda, A. (1994). Dehkhoda dictionary. University of Tehran Press. [In Persian] Hajari, Z. (1998). Dictionary of Persian affixes: Prefixes, infixes, and suffixes. Avay-e Noor. [In Persian] Hasandust, M. (2004). Etymological dictionary of Persian language (5 Vols.). Academy of Persian Language and Literature, Asar publications. [In Persian] Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D. (2010). Understanding morphology (2nd ed.). Routledge. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Lehmann, C. (2015). Thoughts on grammaticalization (3rd ed.). Language Science. Lenepveu-Hotz, A. (2014). The evolution of the Persian aspecto-modal suffix -ē, between the 10th and the 16th centuries. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 4(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.2.03len Lenepveu-Hotz, A. (2018). Evolution of the subjunctive in New Persian (10th–20th): From disappearance to reappearance. Folia Linguistica, 52(s39-s2), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2018-0015 Mo'in, M. (n.d.). Moein Persian dictionary. In Vajehyab. Retrived May 30, 2024, from /http://www.vajehyab.com [In Persian] Naghzguy Kohan, M. (2010). How to identify instances of grammaticalization. Journal of Comparative Linguistics and Literature Research, 1(2), 149–165. [In Persian] Sadeghi, A. A. (1991). Methods and possibilities of word formation in contemporary Persian (1). Danesh Publications, (64), 12–18. [In Persian] Sadeghi, A. A. (1992a). Methods and possibilities of word formation in contemporary Persian (4). Danesh Publications, (69), 21–25. [In Persian] Sadeghi, A. A. (1992b). Methods and possibilities of word formation in contemporary Persian (5). Danesh Publications, (70), 39–45. [In Persian] Sadeghi, A. A. (1993b). Methods and possibilities of word formation in contemporary Persian (11). Danesh Publications, (77), 21–25. [In Persian] Shaghaghi, V. (2002). Negative prefix in Persian. Journal of Academy Letter. 5(4), 85–96. [In Persian] Taheri, E. (2021). Grammaticalization of plural suffix -gal in Iranian languages. Zabanpazhuhi (Journal of Language Research), 12(37), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2020.30584.1847 [In Persian] Tasalli Bakhsh, F., & Changizi, E. (2021). Grammaticalization process of engâr/engâri. Language Research, 11(2), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.22059/jolr.2020.295879.666571 Tripp, C. (2009). Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology: The development of -hood, -dom and -ship in the history of English. Max Neimeyer Verlag. Wischer, I. (2006). Grammaticalization. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 129–136). Elsevier Yousefi, F., Monshizadeh, M., & Zahedi, F. (2021). The evolution of verbal prefix mi in Persian language. Language Research, 11(2), 271–285. https://doi. 10.22059/jolr.2020.310217.666642 [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 155 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 40 |
||