آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 408 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,249 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,065,810 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,126,801 |
Toward a Phylogenetic Taxonomy of the Iranian Languages: A Focus on Kurdish Varieties and Other Related Dialects | ||
| مطالعات زبان‌ها و گویش‌های غرب ایران | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 13، شماره 3، مهر 1404، صفحه 1-22 اصل مقاله (825.66 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22126/jlw.2024.11124.1797 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abdolrahman Sadeghi1؛ Gholamhosein Karimi Doostan* 2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Because of their objective measurement and unambiguous correspondences, syntactic parameters are used as comparanda for deep comparison and relatedness of language varieties. The Parametric Comparison Method (Longobardi & Guardiano, 2009) is based on the hypothesis that syntactic parameters are appropriate traits to use as comparanda for contrastive analysis and distance measurement of language pairs and then to provide language taxonomy. This article addresses the syntactic distance and genealogical taxonomy of language varieties that are closely related genealogically, geographically, and culturally. To analyze relatedness and genealogical issues of Kurdish language varieties and the Persian language, abstract grammatical rules, modeled as syntactic parameters which are applied in the domain of determiner phrase (DP), are used as comparanda. The results show that Laki and Lori are at a close distance from Sorani, and on the other hand, Kurmanji and Kɪrdki are also close syntactically. According to the tree achieved from the syntactic distances, Kurmanji is at one end of the spectrum and Persian is at the other end. Thus, it can be concluded that some preliminary deductions regarding the phylogenetic taxonomy of the Iranian languages and dialects, with a focus on Kurdish language varieties and other related dialects, can be proposed. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| phylogenetic taxonomy؛ syntactic parameters؛ syntactic distance؛ PCM؛ Iranian languages | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Baker, M. C. (2008). The atoms of language: The mind's hidden rules of grammar. Basic books. Bromham, L., & Penny, D. (2003). The modern molecular clock. Nature Reviews Genetics, 4, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1020 Ceolin, A., Guardiano, C., Irimia, M. A., & Longobardi, G. (2020). Formal syntax and deep history. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 488871. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.488871 Chomsky, N. (1955). Logical syntax and semantics: Their linguistic relevance. Language, 31(1), 36–45. Chomsky, N. (1957a). Logical structures in language. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 8(4), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090080406 Chomsky, N. (1981b). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics (pp. 32–75). Longman. Crisma, P., Guardiano, C., & Longobardi, G. (2020). Syntactic diversity and language learnability. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 58(2), 99–130. Croft, W. (2008). Evolutionary linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37(1), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085156 De Gregorio, J., Toral, R., & Sánchez, D. (2024). Exploring language relations through syntactic distances and geographic proximity. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.18430 Dunn, M. (2015). Language phylogenies. In B. B. Bowern & B. Evans (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 190–211). Routledge. Felsenstein, J. (2004). Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates. Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (Vol. 2, pp. 73–113). MIT Press. Greenberg, J. H. (1987). Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press. Greenberg, J. H. (2000). Indo-European and its closest relatives: The Eurasiatic language family: Vol. 1. Grammar. Stanford University Press. Guardiano, C., & Longobardi, G. (2005). Parametric comparison and language taxonomy. In M. Batllori, M. L. Hernanz, C. Picallo, & F. Roca (Eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation (pp. 149–174). Oxford University Press. Hale, M. (2007). Historical linguistics: Theory and method. Blackwell. Lightfoot, D. (1999). The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Wiley-Blackwell. Longobardi, G. (2001). The structure of DPs: Some principles, parameters, and problems. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 562–603). Blackwell. Longobardi, G. (2003). Methods in parametric linguistics and cognitive history. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 3(1), 101–138. Longobardi, G., Ghirotto, S., Guardiano, C., Tassi, F., Benazzo, A., Ceolin, A., & Barbujani, G. (2015a). Across language families: Genome diversity mirrors linguistic variation within Europe. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 157(4), 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22758 Longobardi, G., & Guardiano, C. (2009). Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness. Lingua, 119(11), 1679–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.012 Longobardi, G., Guardiano, C., Silvestri, G., Boattini, A., & Ceolin, A. (2013). Toward a syntactic phylogeny of modern Indo-European languages. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 3(1), 122–152. https://doi.org/l0.1075/jhl.J.L07lon Longobardi, G., & Treves, A. (2023). Grammatical Parameters from a Gene-like Code to Self-Organizing Attractors. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.03152 Matras, Y., Haig, G., & Öpengin, E. (2022). Structural and typological variation in the dialects of Kurdish. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78837-7 Orr, R. A. (1999). Evolutionary biology and historical linguistics. Diachronica, 16(1), 123–157. Roberts, I. G. (1993). Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, Vol. 28). Springer Science & Business Media. Roberts, I. G. (1998). [Review of the book Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective, by A. C. Harris & L. Campbell]. Romance Philology, 51(3), 363–370. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4494 1034 Sokal, R. R., & Michener, C. D. (1958). A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationship. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 38(22), 1409–1438. Windfuhr, G. (2009). The Iranian languages. Routledge. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 133 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 38 |
||