آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 439 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,409 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,660,955 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,395,033 |
The effect of vortex on head loss and pressure fluctuation along the Penstock of Hydroelectric power plant | ||
| فناوری های پیشرفته در بهره وری آب | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 5، شماره 4، دی 1404، صفحه 108-128 اصل مقاله (926.31 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22126/atwe.2025.12912.1192 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Reza Roshan1؛ Rasool Ghobadian* 2 | ||
| 1Department of Water Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Water Engineering, Razi Uni versity, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objective: This study aimed to assess the hydraulic impacts of intake vortices on energy losses and pressure fluctuations in hydropower penstocks and to evaluate the effectiveness of horizontal perforated anti-vortex plates in mitigating these effects. Method: A large-scale laboratory model was used to systematically examine the influence of intake vortices under a wide range of hydraulic conditions. The experiments were conducted by varying the relative submergence depth (S/D = 1.5, 1.75, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0) and the intake Froude number (Fr = 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2) to generate different vortex strengths. Hydraulic parameters, including relative total head loss, relative friction head loss, Darcy–Weisbach friction coefficient, and pressure fluctuations, were measured along the penstock. Pressure fluctuations were recorded at nine measurement sections distributed along the penstock, and the hydraulic performance was compared for cases with and without the installation of an anti-vortex plate. Results: The experimental results clearly demonstrated that the installation of an anti-vortex plate significantly reduced hydraulic losses and pressure fluctuations. On average, the friction coefficient, relative total head loss, and relative friction head loss were reduced to approximately 19.2%, 44.4%, and 20.8% of their corresponding values without the plate, respectively. Increasing the submergence ratio led to a notable increase in relative friction head loss, while the friction coefficient decreased. For a fixed submergence depth, higher Froude numbers intensified vortex strength, resulting in increased total and friction head losses as well as more pronounced pressure fluctuations along the penstock, despite a reduction in the friction coefficient. The dissipation length of vortices was found to depend strongly on vortex class, with weak Class C vortices dissipating within approximately 7 diameters from the intake, Class B vortices persisting up to about 18 diameters, and strong Class A vortices showing no clear dissipation within the tested penstock length. Conclusions: Intake vortices have a substantial adverse effect on the hydraulic performance of hydropower penstocks by increasing energy losses and inducing pressure fluctuations. The results confirm that horizontal perforated anti-vortex plates are an effective and practical solution for mitigating vortex-induced losses and stabilizing flow conditions at intakes. Furthermore, the findings highlight the critical role of submergence depth and intake Froude number in controlling vortex strength and persistence. For strong air-core vortices, considerably longer penstocks or additional mitigation measures may be required to ensure complete vortex attenuation, underscoring the importance of vortex control in the design and operation of hydropower intakes. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| physical model؛ vortex؛ pressure fluctuations؛ anti-vortex plate؛ hydroelectric power plant؛ penstock | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Agbayani, N., Karami, H., Mousavi, S.F., & Sarkardeh, H. (2019). Experimental study of the effect of the trashrack on the vortex at the intake of the hydroelectric power plants in various flow rates and submergence depths. Journal of Dam and Hydroelectric Power plant, 6(21),49-62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334770912_Experimental_study_of_the_effect_of_the_trashrack_on_the_vortex_at_the_intake_of_the_hydroelectric_power_plants Amiri, S. M., Zarrati, A. R., Roshan, R., & Sarkardeh, H. (2011). Surface vortex prevention at power intakes by horizontal plates. Journal of Water Management (ICE), 164(4),193-200. https://doi.org /10.1680/wama.1000009 Azarpira, M., Sarkardeh, H., Tavakkol, S., Roshan, R., & Bakhshi, H. (2014). Vortices in dam reservoir: A case study of Karun III dam. Journal of Sādhanā, 39(5), 1201-1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0252-7 Bajracharya, T. R., Shakya, S. R., Timilsina, A. B., & Dhaka, J. (2020). Effects of geometrical parameters in gravitational water vortex turbines with conical basin. Journal of Renewable Energy. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5373784 ÇELEBIOĞLU, K. (2019). Roughness coefficient of a highly calcined penstock. Teknik Dergi, Paper 545, 9309-9325. https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.447265 Constantinescu, G. S., Patel, V. C., 1998, A numerical model for simulation of pump intake flow and vortices. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124(5), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:2(123) Daggett, L. L.,& Keulegan, G. H. (1974). Similitude in free-surface vortex formation. J Hydraul Eng, 100, 1565–1580. https://doi.org/10.1061/ JYCEAJ.0004105 Guilliver, J.S., & Rindels, A. J. (1987). Weak vortices at vertical intakes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 113(9), 1101-1116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:9(1101) Jain, A. K., Raju, K. G. R., & Garde, R. J. (1978). Vortex formation at vertical pipe intake. J Hydraul Eng , 100(10), 1427–1445. https://doi.org/ 10.1061/JYCEAJ.0005087 Keller, J., Möller, G., Boes, R.M. (2014). PIV measurements of air-core intake vortices. Journal of Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 40(40), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.flowmeasinst.2014.08.004 Leon, A. S. (2016). Determining optimal discharge and optimal penstock diameter in water turbines, international symposium on hydraulic structures. Utah State University, Portland, Oregon, USA, 27-30. https://doi.org/10.15142/T390628160853 Manogaran, T., Zainol, M. R. R. M. A., Wahab, M. K. A., Aziz, M. S. A., Abd Aziz, N., Zahari, N. M., & Radzi, M. R. M. (2023). Free-surface vortices mitigation using anti-vortex plates in dam intakes through CFD. CFD Letters, 15(6), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.15.6.2641 Möller, G. Detert, M., & Boes, R. M. (2015). Vortex-induced air entrainment rates at intakes, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 141(11), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001036 Möller, G., Detert, M., & Boes, R. M. (2012). Air entrainment due to vortices: State-of the-art. 2nd International Association of Hydraulic Engineering Europe Congress, IAHR Press, Munich, Germany. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/63100 Moukam, T., François, N., Thomas, D., & Bienvenu, K. (2022). Numerical evaluation of turbulent friction on walls in the penstock of the Three-Gorges Dam by the Swamee-Jain method. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.054 Odgaard, A. J. )1986(. Free surface air core vortex. J Hydraul Eng , 112(7), 610–619. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1061/(ASCE) 0733- 9429(1986)112:7(610) Padmanabhan, M., & Larsen, J. (2001). Chapter 10.2: Intake modeling. Pump handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York. https://turbosan.com/pdf/pumphandbook.pdf Partovi Azar, S. , Farsadizadeh, D. , Hosseinzadeh Dalir, A. , Salmasi, F., & Sadraddini, A. (2010). Estimation of Critical Submergence at Intake System of Aydoghmush Dam Using FLUENT Model. Water and Soil Science, 20(3), 1-14. https://water-soil.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_1328.html?lang=en Rahm, L. (1953). Flow problems with respect to intakes and tunnels of Swedish hydro-electric power plants. Bulletin, No. 36, Institution of hydraulic at the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. https://public.ucrlib.aspace.cdlib.org/repositories/5/archival_objects/582280 Roshan, R. (2023). Laboratory investigation on the effect of anti-vortex plates and reservoir geometry on the hydrodynamics of vortex flow in power plant Intakes. PhD thesis in hydraulic structures, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. Roshan, R., & Ghobadian, R. (2022). The Effect of anti-vortex plates on vortex dissipation, discharge coefficient and inlet loss coefficient in hydropower intakes. Journal of Hydraulics, 17(3), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.30482/jhyd.2022.302255.1547 Roshan, R., & Ghobadian, R. (2023). The effect of reservoir geometry on the critical submergence depth in hydroelectric power plants intake. Applied Water Science, 13, 155, 2-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-01960-z Sarkardeh, H., Jabbari, E., Zarrati, A.R., & Tavakkol, S. (2013). Velocity field in a reservoir in the presence of an air-core vortex. Journal of Water Management (ICE), 164(4), 193–200. https://doi.org/ 10.1680/wama.13.00046 Sarkardeh, H., Zarrati, A. R., Jabbari, E., & Roshan, R. (2012). Discussion of prediction of intake vortex risk by nearest neighbors modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137(6), 701-705. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000344 Sarkardeh, H., Zarrati, A. R., & Roshan, R. (2010). Effect of intake head wall and trash rack on vortices. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 48(1), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680903565952 Singhal, M. K., & Kumar, A. (2015). Optimum design of penstock for hydro projects. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering , 4(4), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20150404.14 Suerich-Gulick, F., Gaskin, S. J., Villeneuve, M., & Parkinson, É. (2014). Characteristics of free surface vortices at low-head hydropower intakes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 140(2), 291-299. https:// doi.org /10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000826 Sukhapure, K., Burns, A., Mahmud, T., & Spooner, J. (2018). CFD modelling and validation of loss Coefficients for penstock bifurcation in hydropower schemes. 3rd Thermal and Fluids Engineering Conference (TFEC), 395-406.http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/TFEC2018.cmd.021574 Zheng, G., Gu, Z., Xu, W., Lu, B., Li, Q., Tan, Y., & Li, L. (2023). Gravitational surface vortex formation and suppression control: A review from hydrodynamic characteristics. Processes, 11(42), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010042 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 55 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 61 |
||