آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 472 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,714 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,521,060 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,299,611 |
Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Bolting-Resistant Hybrids in Autumn-Sown Sugar Beet | ||
| Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 01 آبان 1405 اصل مقاله (753.85 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22126/atic.2026.13372.1259 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hamed Mansouri* 1؛ Mohammad Saeed Hasanvandi2؛ Hamze Hamze1 | ||
| 1Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
| 2Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| To evaluate new bolting-resistant sugar beet hybrids for quantitative and qualitative characteristics, and their susceptibility to Cercospora disease and resistance to bolting, an experiment was conducted in two regions of Iran: Dezful and Gachsaran, under autumn sowing conditions. The study involved fifteen bolting-resistant hybrid varieties and five check varieties. The experiment was designed as a randomized complete block design. Due to non-homogeneity of variances across environments, analyses were conducted separately for each location, based on Bartlett’s test. The mean comparison indicated that hybrid G13 exhibited the highest white sugar yield in the Dezful environment, with an output of 9.00 tons ha-1. Similarly, hybrid G7 achieved the highest yield in the Gachsaran environment, producing 12.90 tons ha-1, outperforming other hybrids. Cluster analysis in Dezful revealed that the third cluster, which includes genotypes G13 and G14, was the best based on studied traits. In contrast, cluster five was the best in the Gachsaran environment. This cluster comprises eight genotypes: G1, G2, G6, G7, G10, G11, G12, and G14. Additionally, the biplot analysis conducted in Dezful identified G13 and G8 as the top-performing hybrids. Biplot analysis indicated that among the hybrids studied, G7, G6, G11, G3, G9, and G5 exhibited more favorable traits compared to the other hybrids in the Gachsaran environment. Overall, the results identified hybrids G13 (SC(990014 × 990008) × S1-990002) and G8 (SC(990019 × 990007) as superior due to their higher quantitative and qualitative yields and reduced susceptibility to Cercospora disease in the Dezful environment. Similarly, hybrids G7 (SC(990015 × 990007) × S1-990002), G6 (SC(990014 × 990007) × S1-990002), and G11 (SC(990023 × 990007) × S1-990002) were recognized as superior in the Gachsaran environment, thanks to their favorable quantitative and qualitative yields and lower bolting percentages compared to the other hybrids. Therefore, selected hybrids were introduced to develop bolting-resistant varieties. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
| ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Bolting؛ Cercospora؛ Cultivar؛ Sugar yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akyüz A., Ersus S. 2021. Optimization of enzyme assisted extraction of protein from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves for alternative plant protein concentrate production. Food Chemistry 335: 127673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127673
Azizi H., Pedram A., Fasahat P. 2021. Identification of effective traits on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) root yield under natural infection conditions to rhizomania virus disease. Journal of Crop Breeding 13(37): 197-204. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.52547/jcb.13.37.197
Ghasemi S., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S., Taleghani D., Siavashi K., Hosseinpour M. 2020. Determination of the proper planting date and harvest of commercial sugar beet cultivars in autumn cultivation in Ilam province. Journal of Sugar Beet 36(1): 15-25. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2021.343129.1240
Hamzeh H., Mansouri H., Hasani H., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S. 2024. Evaluation of new O-type lines of sugar beet resistant to root and crown rhizoctonia rot in the conditions of microplot artificial contamination. Journal of Sugar Beet 39(2): 125-138 (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2024.365029.1347
Hassani M., Hamze H., Mansori H., Fathullah Taleghani D., Jalilian A., Soltani Idliki J. 2021. Evaluation of genetic parameters, relationships between traits and grouping of new sugar beet hybrids in terms of quantitative and qualitative traits under Rhizomonia contamination condition. Journal of Crop Breeding 13(38): 149-159. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.52547/jcb.13.38.149
Hoffmann C.M., Kluge-Severin S. 2011. Growth analysis of autumn and spring sown sugar beet. European Journal of Agronomy 34(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.09.001
Kuska M.T., von Tiedemann S., Mahlein A.K. 2020. How table sugar is produced from sugar beets. Frontiers for Young Minds 8: 108. https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.2020.00108
Mansouri H. 2025. Development and evaluation of sugar beet hybrids resistant to bolting based on new single crosses. Final report of research. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). (In Farsi).
Mansouri H., Hamze H., Hassani M. 2024a. Identification of resistant pollinator lines to soil-borne Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kühn, 1858 in sugar beet using SIIG technique. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 89(3): 199-208. https://hrcak.srce.hr/321024
Mansouri H., Hamze H., Hassani M., Aliverdi A. 2024b. Resistance evaluation and identification of new sugar beet pollinator lines resistant to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Journal of Sugar Beet 40(1): 31-46. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22092/JSB.2024.366460.1364
Mansouri H., Yousefabadi V., Hamze H., Azizi H. 2025. Evaluation of quality characteristics and yield of some commercial sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars in Hamedan Province (Nahavand and Asadabad). Journal of Agroecology 17(3): 491-507. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22067/AGRY.2025.93586.1240
Metzger M.J., Bunce R.G.H., Jongman R.H., Mücher C.A., Watkins J.W. 2005. A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14(6): 549-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00190.x
Milford G., Jarvis P., Walters C. 2010. A vernalization-intensity model to predict bolting in sugar beet. The Journal of Agricultural Science 148(2): 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990323
Milford G., Limb R. 2008. Bolting in sugar beet–time to re-evaluate our advice? British Sugar Beet Review 76: 3-5.
Monteiro F., Frese L., Castro S., Duarte M.C., Paulo O.S., Loureiro J., Romeiras M.M. 2018. Genetic and genomic tools to assist sugar beet improvement: The value of the crop wild relatives. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00074
Reinsdorf E., Koch H.J., Loel J., Hoffmann C.M. 2014. Yield of bolting winter beet (Beta vulgaris L.) as affected by plant density, genotype and environment. European Journal of Agronomy 54: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.11.011
Ribeiro I.C., Pinheiro C., Ribeiro C.M., Veloso M.M., Simoes-Costa M.C., Evaristo I., Paulo O.S., Ricardo C.P. 2016. Genetic diversity and physiological performance of portuguese wild beet (Beta vulgaris spp. maritima) from three contrasting habitats. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 1293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01293
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S., Hassani M., Jalilian A.L.I., Mirzai M.R., Hamze H., Mansouri H. 2024. Evaluation and comparison of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of commercial sugar beet cultivars in the western region of the country (Kermanshah and Lorestan). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 34(1): 113-128. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2023.53293.2920
Sarica D. 2024. Forecasting sugar beet production in Turkey using the Box-Jenkins Method. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 26(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.22034/JAST.26.1.1
Schnepel K., Hoffmann C.M. 2016. Effect of extending the growing period on yield formation of sugar beet. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 202(6): 530-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12153
Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI). 2023. Annual Research Report. Sugar Beet Seed Institute Press. Karaj, Iran. 157 p. (In Farsi).
Taleghani D.F., Mansouri H., Sadeghi-Shoae M., Noshad H., Moharamzadeh M. 2024. Effect of nitrogen rates on yield, non-sugar impurities and NUE of four sugar beet varieties under drip irrigation conditions. Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops 4(2): 89-97. https://doi.org/10.22126/atic.2024.10326.1140
Taleghani D.F., Moharamzadeh M., Hemayati S.S., Mohammadian R., Farahmand R. 2011. Effect of sowing and harvest time on yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Moghan region in Iran. Seed and Plant Production Journal 27(3): 355-371. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22092/sppj.2017.110442
Taleghani D.F., Saremirad A., Hosseinpour M., Ahmadi M., Hamidi H., Nemati R. 2022. Genotype × environment interaction effect on white sugar yield of winter-sown short-season sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars. Seed and Plant Journal 38(1): 53-69. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22092/spj.2022.360021.1275
Tazikeh N., Biabani A., Saberi A., Karizaki A.R., Naimi M. 2023. Effect of bolting on root yield and qualities of autumn sugar beet cultivars. Iran Agricultural Research 42(1): 99-107. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22099/IAR.2023.48068.1552 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2 |
||